20 August 2018
By Tim Koch
Tim Koch sees the Kaiser in a new light.
My recent piece, The Grosse Wiener – and Ruder Things, began:
While the British claim to have invented (or at least codified) rowing as a sport, Germany and Austria-Hungary were among the earliest and most enthusiastic of the countries that subsequently adopted it as a popular pastime, both quickly developing their own traditions.
I went on to note that one very different tradition was that the boathouses of German rowing clubs were often large and elaborate affairs. Even clubs in unfashionable provincial towns could be based in buildings that were equal to – or even better than – those of the Grand Old Clubs in Britain. I speculated that the finance for these expensive structures would have come from two sources:
Firstly, the ruderclubs often had attached restaurants and cafes that were open to all and which must have brought in a welcome income. Secondly, there was – and is – a tradition not just of racing boats over short distances, but also of long-distance touring in slow and stable craft. I suspect that the latter less demanding pastime kept a large membership on the books, effectively subsidising the racing members. Both of these factors may have made many Germanic clubs more family orientated and women-friendly than their strictly ‘men only’ equivalents in the UK.
Below are some pictorial examples of impressive German boathouses. As to the club names, ’ruderverein’ or ‘ruder-verein’ is German for ‘rowing club’ or ‘rowing society’. Some German clubs use this in their title, others go with ‘ruderclub’ or ‘ruder-club’. Others choose to use the German ‘klub’. The word ‘ruder’ can refer to a rudder, a scull or a sweep oar – it depends on the context.
My article produced an enthusiastic response from Stephan Ploke, the President of Münster’s Akademischer Ruderverbindung Westfalen (Academic Rowing Fraternity of Westphalia). Rowing historian Tom Weil and I first met him a year ago in the bar at Leander when Stephan and his club mates were touring the Thames. Tom subsequently wrote about this meeting for HTBS.
Stephan is also a keen student of rowing history and added some valuable information to my post:
Emperor Wilhelm I, but particularly his son, Wilhelm II, who reigned from 1888 to 1918, wanted to raise Germany to a world-power and firmly believed that the key towards achieving this was a strong fleet that could match the British Navy. Hence they heavily invested in the Navy but also supported water sports to enthuse young people for anything maritime, of course with the ultimate goal that they would later join the Navy. In these decades there was a real mania for anything maritime (for example, little kids would wear naval outfits) and Wilhelm I and Wilhelm II donated many prizes for rowing regattas and visited many of them personally on the royal yacht Alexandria.
The aforementioned maritime enthusiasm is also mirrored by the parade of 600 rowing boats right in front of the boathouse of Akademischer Ruderverein Berlin on the occasion of the Emperor’s birthday – you have a postcard showing this in your article.
Wilhelm II also financed a large portion of the impressive art nouveau boathouse of Akademischer Ruderverein Berlin from his personal funds whilst the remainder was funded by the director of Agfa (the German photo-film company), who was rewarded with a noble title in return by Wilhelm…
Similar instances were actually a major source in funding German clubs and boathouses around the turn of the century – it was rarely the Emperor himself donating money and founding clubs, but many higher ranked men in the public administration and as well as rich citizens who wanted either to please the Emperor or were likewise enthused with the maritime movements of that time donated loads of money to rowing and sailing clubs. A good example is our founder in Münster, who was the President of Westphalia at that time and later became Wilhelm II’s minister of cultural affairs in Berlin…
Germans are quite notorious for their love of founding a club for almost anything and they spend lots of time and personal resource in and on their clubs. As such, particularly in the old times, whole families would join the rowing clubs and not just come there to row, but also spending more time there, eating there, having coffee, playing billiards or just hang out, sometimes the entire weekend, that why many boathouses have restaurants or cafes. And of course, this use as a second home increase the need for more elaborate structures but of course also the willingness to pay for it or donate to it.
In my response to Stephan, I thanked him for his input and reiterated the fact that German rowing history is a source of great frustration to me as its riches almost certainly match that of Britain, but I can access so little information on it – even with the help of ‘Google Translate’.
Thus, the high standard of buildings and equipment in German rowing clubs in the late 19th/early 20th century was in part due to the encouragement of, and practical support from, the Kaiser and his supporters in order to assist in making Germany a maritime power to match Britain.
I sent Stephan a follow-up question about the tradition of long-distance ‘touring’ or ‘wanderrudern’ done at a gentle pace in stable boats:
Did most clubs offer both touring and racing, or were there many that did only one type? Has the balance between the two changed much over the years? I think that British rowing has lost out by not having a tradition of touring. Even though the Victorians and Edwardians did a lot of this (‘Three Men in a Boat’ etc), it was not done out of rowing clubs, the boats were simply hired from commercial boatyards as required.
Stephan’s response was very illuminating:
(Touring) is a quintessential part of German rowing – if not German rowing per se. I don’t know any club that does not do or offer touring, even the big racing clubs like Berliner RC, Frankfurter Germania, ETuF Essen or Allemannia Hamburg do it and I would estimate that touring or rowing in touring boats without any race-ambitions accounts for the majority of outings and the mileage in almost any German club.
Racing and training for is traditionally limited to very few rowers/crews per club and typically targets at developing rowers for the junior or senior national teams, but there is hardly anything in between, i.e. other than in the UK, there is nothing like second level club crews competing in races like the Head of the River, Henley Club Events or the numerous senior races at regattas like Maidenhead, Marlow or Metropolitan and the like. I am a big critic of this practice which results in the fact that there are very limited options for rowers who realise they won’t make the team: you either row in the touring groups which is not really what you want if are 20 and came back from the junior nationals or you quit rowing.
The establishment of the “Bundesliga” i.e. the series of 350m sprinting races with an overall winner has been a semi-successful attempt to offer an alternative and to keep athletes in the clubs. Moreover, many, mainly smaller and provincial clubs, do not even offer racing at all, as they fear the high costs of training and races, i.e. for boats, coaches, travelling etc.
You are right in your assumption that in a typical club the touring fraction subsidises the racing squads and the boathouses and I would also agree with your statement that the average standard of German boathouses is well above their UK counterparts (with exceptions like Leander of course) which, on the contrary, typically house many more racing shells.
As to your last question, I don’t think that the overall balances between touring and racing has shifted notably in the last century in general, of course in certain clubs it has, but this is typically dependent on the people and club board pushing one or the other aside! In the end, the two systems in the UK and Germany are completely different with numerous pros and cons on both sides.
Great stuff, Stephan, danke schön.